Showing posts with label cinders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cinders. Show all posts

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Can You Feel It?

All---

I now know the lucky (?) person who will have a moment of his or life Nevetsized, chosen by random selection from those who commented on the contest post. Stay tuned! I will be announcing the winner later today!

In the mean time, you might want to ponder a couple of upcoming Nevets.QST events. One, a contest which will be officially kicked off next week, will revolve around content from my websiste, www.Nevets-QST.com and will feature another prize from the Nevetsize Your Stuff store as well as a Nevetsization prize to be announced then.

The other will be the first "blogfest" I've ever hosted. I don't normally even participate in these, but I was working on an idea and I decided I'd love to fest it. I'll save the details for next week, but the 10th anniversary of when my wife and I got engaged is coming up late this fall, and I'm planning to step outside my normal content and write something that in somehow honors that. The fest will invite author authors to not necessarily step outside their genre our style, but to step outside of their usual content and themes. More soon.

And in the meanwhile, if you're just champing at the bit, be sure to check out Michelle Davidson Argyle's Cinders blog tour (with great prizes!) and the great book giveaway being hosted by Jenna White, a young, energetic author with consistently mature advice for developing writers.

.Nevets.


Tuesday, September 7, 2010

The Genre Monster

All---

Literary author Michelle Davidson Argyle recently asked this question about her recent novella, Cinders:

If you have read Cinders, what genre would you put it in? Why?

This reminded me of something important about genre: no book occupies the same genre. When they do, it's coincidence. There are at least three genres for any given book. They may or may not overlap. I think taxonomically, and I'm a splitter not a lumper. I need to categorize, label, and sort in order to understand the world. Let me try to explain what I mean about book genres for those of you who are not geared in the same way, because odds are you don't instinctively think that way.

Genre #1: Absolute Genre. I'm using the term "absolute" a little too freely here, but what I am referring to is the genre which a book occupies from an analytical standpoint. Here, the only things that matter are style, structure, and content, perhaps with a nod to authorial intent. For many writers, this is the only genre they think of.

Genre #2: Marketing Genre. It sounds distasteful to our artistic integrity, but every book also has a genre in which it is most marketable. How will you classify it in order to get the best promotional package, the most passerby patronage, the most press? This is the business side of writing, and if you're an author who is hoping to make a living at writing or at least a major part of one, you ignore this genre at your own peril.

Genre #3: Locator Genre. People need to find your book. This has become less critical in the internet age, but it's still important. When someone is browsing a bookstore and they suddenly remember that they wanted to look for your book -- where will they default to as the first location to look for it? If someone is recommending your book to a friend, where will they assume that friend can find it? If a used bookstore manager is sorting out books in the store, where is she most likely to shelve yours?

Case Study: Cinders. Since it's the book that started the question, here's how I think of Cinders fitting into these genres. Is absolute genre is literary fiction, assuming you consider that a genre. It is in the same tradition as books like Animal Farm, The Man Who Was Thursday, and perhaps most appropriately The Princess and the Goblin. It uses the forms, structures, and tropes of other genres, but really focuses on writing craft and has its long-term goals set on internals rather than externals.

On the other hand, its marketing genre is most likely YA fantasy with the tag, "that adults can also enjoy." There's no question that Cinders is difficult to pigeonhole from a marketting perspective. I don't believe it can be sold as traditional fantasy, because while it employs some elements of fantasy (magic, sprites, curses, etc...) it does not really emphasize these or world creation for their own sake, nor does it -- with the exception of the middle -- unfold as a fantasy plot. I don't think it can be sold as historical fiction, because while it include such details for authenticity they are minor, and the characters themselves are not drawn from history, and the plot is not the narrative of events one typically sees in historical fiction. The same holds true for romance. The YA fantasy genre, however, is more forgiving. It tends to treat both fantasy and romance with a softer touch, and often shifts the emphasis from action to internals. Here's what it boils down to: your marketing genre is the one with the most receptive audience, the most appropriate promotional venues, and is least likely to leave readers saying, "Um, this isn't really a blank book."

Sometimes the trickiest genre to anticipate is the locator genre, which is most likely to be fantasy or historical romance for Cinders. This genre is really ex post facto. How do casual readers who have read the book think of it? This is often a gloss of their entire experience, and will most likely hit on the things that stand out first in their memories. For most casual readers of Cinders, that will probably be the fantasy elements or the touches of historical romance (descriptions of the kitchen and meals plus bedroom scenes = historical romance). Why is this important to the author? A couple of reasons. First, if there's a mismatch between the locator genre and the marketing genre, people can have trouble finding the book. Second, identifying the locator genre can sometimes tell you if you were successful in achieving your aims for the book. Often times, the best way to determine the locator genre is to ask your beta readers what genre they think it was, especially if you have a few casual readers.

I feel like I may have rambled here, but I hope that helps. Does any one have any additional genres that should be considered?

.Nevets.


Saturday, September 4, 2010

Cinders: A Review


Cinders
A novella by Michelle Davidson Argyle
Create Space, 2010
ISBN 1453629955

“Sometimes she forgot about the other man, the stranger she'd met long ago, long before she was given fur shoes and knew there were such things as magic and spells.”

The great strength of Cinders is that it does not dwell. It does not need to. Argyle's prose is tight and the reading space between the lines is packed with layers. In a single sentence, such as the above, Argyle is able to connect the reader to her main character's past, present, and future, and to the emotional relationship Cinderella has with each.

In Cinders, Argyle demonstrates a rare sense of restraint. The temptations for digression, exposition, and exploration in a work like this abound. An author could be forgiven for reveling in the historical fiction aspect of restoring to a popular fairy tale the trappings of real life. An author could be forgiven for ruminating about in the philosophical and social contradictions between the circumstances of a popular fairy tale and the reality of human experience. An author could even be forgiven for relishing the opportunity to make a popular legend her own.

Argyle does each of these things, but she does not obsess over any of them. Instead, her obsession is her character. Her Cinderella is a woman like any other. A woman with passions, frustrations, desires, and plenty of questions. She does not quite understand where she is, how she got there, or where she's going. This, to me, felt like the heart of Argyle's story. Cinders is not a re-telling of the Cinderella story or a turning-on-its-head of the fairy tale as a form. It is the story of a young woman who got what she thought she wanted and then realized she didn't really know what she wanted – or what she got.

Because Argyle does not dwell on any topic, theme, or passage, Cinders moves at a brisk pace that only slows down during a few moments of nostalgia and during the denouement. This style also means that the reader is given both the responsibility and the liberty to connect the dots. While told in third person, the narrative voice of the story is essentially Cinderella's, and yet because of the tight style and the fairy tale form there is little exposition or externalization of the main character's psychology.

The one limitation of this novella, if there is one, is that many readers will likely not know what to expect or, therefore, how to approach it. Cinders should not be read at a quick, surface level as if it were a YA fantasy romance. It is literary fiction, told in the form and tradition of the fairy tale. As such, a patient and thoughtful reader will be rewarded with a reach and intricate experience. A more casual reader will likely enjoy the story, but may find it difficult to relate to Cinderella at times, and may not be satisfied by the ending. Argyle does not serve the entire story on a platter, but she serves it well, to anyone willing to take their time and enjoy it.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Loving the UnLovable

All---

This is not a review of Cinders, nor a response to it, nor a commentary upon it. I am only a page and a half in. However, that first page and a half sparked one of my favorite memes for reflection and ranting and I thought I would share that with you all.

(Incidentally, in case you have been following my chatter the past few days, I decided to start with Cinders instead of The Dog of the North because it's shorter, comes first in alphabetical order by both title and author, and because as much as I have place-name envy for Tim's homeland, I'd live near the rockies in a heartbeat. But I digress.)

As far as I know, this rant has next to nothing to do with any ideas that are expressed in Cinders.

So here's the thing. I hate Cinderella. I hate Beauty and the Beast. I hate most popularized fairy tales that touch upon the notion of someone loving someone who seems unloved and unlovable. Why? Because they don't show what they claim to teach! Typically, the lovely person falls in love with the unlovely person while under the impression that the unlovely person actually is lovely. Often times, the unlovely person is rewarded by becoming permanently lovely.

Excuse me?

This is touching? This is meaningful? This is deep?

The stories may be fun and entertaining at some level, but they really do the exact thing they claim to be teaching people not to do. Cinderella is not about a young woman overcoming her family and position to win the heart of the prince by her own strength and through her own virtues. It is about a young woman who is made to look like someone she is not, and who the prince cannot help but fall in love with because she's fake and created specifically to win his heart over.

She's an airbrushed fake.

The prince, essentially responds to her like some twentieth century schmoe responding physically to a porn star. It's got nothing to do with her. It's got to do with the fact that she's faked up specifically to be attractive to schmoes like him.

And, if I may, I'd like to suggest one further heresy. In the popular Cinderella, her step-mother and her step-sisters are cold and cruel and obsessed with status. Cinderella is humble and sweet and charming.

Ah, but on her own Cinderella has no gown or coach or slippers -- and certainly no right to dance with the prince at the ball.

Magic gives her those things.

She doesn't have to work for them at all. She's just given them.

So of course she's going to shine amongst all the other "proper" girls. She's not one. She just got the same place they did. You know what happens to the people who earn those things by position or effort? They become cold and cruel and obsessed with status.

One theme that runs through my own writing, pretty strongly at times, is redemption. For me, it's always been essential that that redemption not be for obvious reasons. If I want to show the importance of loving someone who is unlovable, that person better darn well be unlovable when someone loves them. If the person transforms first than they are no longer unlovable. And what's remarkable or interesting about people loving people who are lovable?

.Nevets.

p.s. The three-dashes thing ("All---") is a homage to a punctuation technique I crafted in my teen years tour as a space opera writer. It's how people signed on to the communications system. Tap your your fingers together to bring the implants in contact, open the circuit through your body, say the name of the person you want to talk to, and supply three dashes. ---Out.


Label Cloud

#DarkAndTwisted (5) a razor wrapped in silk (2) about me (5) absolute (1) acceptance (1) accountability (1) advice (54) aesop (2) agents (2) agony (1) aikido (6) alaska (2) alcohol (1) alex mackenzie (1) aliya whiteley (1) allegory (1) allergies (1) alone (1) amaretto (1) ambulance (17) anchors (1) andy dick (1) angel lost (1) anthology (4) anthony pacheco (1) anthropology (4) applesauce (1) approach (1) appropriateness (1) arashi (1) archaeology (1) archaeololgy (3) argyle (1) art (1) audio (3) author (11) award (1) background (1) bacon (2) bar (1) battlestar galactica (1) bbs (1) beauty (1) ben folds (1) bhangra (1) bioarchaeology (1) biography (2) birthday (1) blog tour (1) blogfest (9) blogging (5) blogosphere (2) blogsclusive (14) blurb (1) bones (2) book (4) boring (1) born to fly (1) boss (1) boundaries (1) braai (1) bravery (2) bridge flag (1) brutal (1) business (3) c + c music factory (1) c n nevets (108) c s lewis (1) cabin (1) cafepress (6) cantaloupe (1) career (2) cat (1) challenge (2) character (11) cheesy (1) cherry republic (1) christmas (4) chuck palahniuk (2) chumbawumba (1) cinderella (2) cinders (4) clarissa draper (2) classification (3) clive cussler (1) commentary (4) community (1) compelling (1) complete (1) confidence (4) conflict (1) conformity (1) confusion (1) congress (1) conspiracy (1) contest (31) conversation (1) cooking (1) cottage (1) courage (5) craft (4) creation (2) creep (2) crime (1) crime writing (36) criminal (2) criticism (2) critiques (2) crow (1) culture (2) cussler (1) cutting (1) dark (11) davin malasarn (3) death (1) deb markanton (4) deborah swift (1) deduction (1) definition (2) description (2) destruction (1) development (3) dialectic (1) dialogue (1) direction (1) discussion (2) dog of the north (2) domey malasarn (5) dr. who (1) drama (3) dramatic (1) dream (1) drugs (1) edit (2) editors (4) emotion (1) ems (8) emt (3) endings (1) ennui and malaise (4) entry (1) epiphany (1) escher (2) essay (2) ethics (3) everyday (1) evil (3) excerpt (3) exercise (1) existentialish (4) existianlism (2) experience (3) experimental (1) fables (1) facebook (3) failure (1) fairy tale (2) fallibility (1) fantasia (1) fantasy (2) fear (5) feedback (3) fiction (26) fit (1) flas (1) flash (22) flash fiction (8) flight (1) flying knee (1) food (2) forensic anthropology (3) forensics (5) frances garrood (2) frustration (1) fun (2) fwiww (1) game (1) gary corby (3) gawain (1) genre (29) germ (1) ghost (3) gideon (1) gift (4) give away (2) golden eagle (1) government (1) growing up (1) grumbling (3) gsa (1) guest post (13) hair metal (1) harry potter (1) health (4) heavy metal (1) hegel (6) help (3) historical fiction (3) history (3) holiday (1) home (3) hopeless (2) horror (3) hot dish (1) houseboat (2) humans (1) humor (1) idea (2) imagination (2) impressionism (1) indiana jones (2) induction (1) influences (1) information (5) insight (1) inspiration (2) intentionality (1) international (2) internet radio (1) interview (2) introduction (2) investigation (1) iticism (1) jabberwocky (1) jack higgins (2) japan (4) jc martin (1) jeffrey deaver (1) jennifer hillier (7) jon jones (1) journal (1) jpop (2) jurisdiction (1) jurisprudence (5) justice (1) justification (1) kanjani8 (1) kansai oniisan (5) kathy reichs (1) knowing (2) koontz (1) kung fu (1) law (5) learning (1) legacy (1) lies (2) life (8) light (1) limits (1) linear (2) lines (2) lite (1) literary (3) literary fiction (10) literary lab (4) literature (3) loren eaton (3) louis lamour (1) love (1) lt host (1) ludlum (1) lydia kang (1) lyrics (1) mandarin chinese (3) marilyn meredith (3) marketing (5) marriage (1) martial arts (3) marxism (1) mascota (1) meaning (1) melons (1) memories (2) mentoring (1) mercury rising (1) meta (1) michael crichton (1) michael malone (1) michelle davidson argyle (9) minnows (1) misha (1) mma (2) monday moment (1) monty python (1) mood (1) moplo (1) morality (4) motion (1) motivation (2) motive for murder (1) mr. saggy (1) mug (1) murder (5) muse (1) music (2) mutilation (1) myster (1) mystery (5) mystery men (1) narrative (1) neanderthal (1) neo-orthodox (1) nevetsize (15) nevetsosophy (1) news (38) nick diaz (1) non-linear (1) nonsense (1) northern michigan (1) nostalgia (3) not subtle (1) notes from underground (3) nothing changes (1) nothing happens (1) novel (9) novella (1) obfuscation (1) obsession (1) octopus (1) oetzi (1) on call (1) one point (2) oops (1) opinion (1) original (2) osaka (2) outline (3) p g wodehouse (1) pain (1) pancakes (1) paradox (3) paranormal (1) passion (1) perceval (1) persistence (1) person (1) personal (66) phil loring (1) philosophy (9) piano (1) pictures (1) pie (1) pink floyd (3) place (1) plot (5) plug (1) podcast (3) poetry (1) police (3) politics (2) poll (1) pomo (1) post modern (1) potential (1) pouland ann dvorjak (1) pov (6) power (1) practice (2) pre-writing (3) precision (1) pretty (1) priorities (2) prize (13) process (8) production (1) progress (3) projects (3) promotion (9) prompt (2) pscyhology (7) psychological suspense (27) public defender (1) publication (24) puffin (1) pun (1) querying (2) question (8) r n morris (5) rachel in the oc (1) rachel thompson (1) radio (1) rambling (2) random (3) rant (2) reader (4) readi (1) reading (10) real stakes (10) realism (2) reasoning (1) recommendations (1) redemption (1) rejection (6) relationship (1) release (2) religion (1) request (3) research (1) response (1) results (1) review (6) revision (2) riddles (1) rights (1) rj clarken (1) rj ellory (5) romance (3) rose (4) rules (2) russia (1) rusty nail (1) ryan david jahn (6) ryne douglas pearson (2) sample (2) scifi (1) scotch (1) scotland (1) scott bailey (1) scottish (1) second person (1) selfhelp (4) serial killer (1) serial murderers (1) setting (1) seuss (1) shirt (2) short (1) short story (28) shush (1) sisko (1) skills (1) skulls (1) sleepy (1) slice of life (1) smoke (1) smugness (1) smurfs (1) social (3) solitude (11) solomon matthews (1) soundtrack (1) specialization (1) speculative fiction (1) spiral (3) spirit (1) sports (1) star trek (3) stephen king (1) steven seagal (1) store (1) stories for sendai (9) story (42) strengths (1) structure (6) struggle (29) stuff (2) style (27) sublimation (19) submission (11) suffering (1) suicide (2) summer ross (2) surrealism (1) suspense (6) sweet (1) sword stained with royal blood (2) synonyms (1) system (1) tactless tuesday (10) taekwondo (1) takoyaki (1) taphonomy (1) tara maya (2) taste (1) tater tots (1) tea time with serial killers (2) teaser (3) technique (7) ted kennedy (1) teddy bear (1) teen (2) teilhard (1) telling (2) terminal instar (5) tesol (1) the dirty dozen (1) the girl with the dragon tattoo (1) the life of brian (1) the muppet show (1) the wild grass (1) theme (3) theory (1) therapy (2) thinking (2) threat (1) thriller (5) tim stretton (4) timeline (1) tips (20) tone (3) top gun (1) top ten (1) topic (1) trailer (6) transformation (1) translation (1) travel (1) tribute (1) trivia (1) trolls (1) twisted (3) twitter (5) ufc (1) update (26) uzziel (1) vacation (1) veggie tales (1) video (1) violence (2) vogon (1) voice (11) volunteer (1) vomit (1) vonda mcintyre (1) walgreens (2) website (2) western (2) whatif (1) whining (2) william faulkner (1) winner (2) wip (6) wisdom (3) word choice (2) writing (174) wu xia (1) ya (1) yamashita tomohisa (1) yin and yang (1) yuan chengzhi (1) zhao peng (1) zoe winters (1) zora neal hurston (1)