There are worse things than being bored. You could be trapped in a cavern of horrors behind a green door. You could lose a year of your life in which you might have committed murder. You could be stuck in a heat wave, staring at a swimming pool that isn't clean enough to swim in.
I want my writing to be interesting, clearly, and as a writer of thrillers, a certain amount of excitement is rightly to be expected. But if being bored isn't the worst thing in the world, why should I be terrified of it in my writing? Do I want to write a boring story? Um, no. But do I need to fret over every little passage, afraid it might bore some readers?
No.
There aren't many books that I don't skip passages in. I'm a terrible reader in some ways. I have such a poor visual imagination that I skim through or skip over most lengthy descriptive passages. I can't conjure the image in my mind, so I bore easily.
And what do I do when I'm bored?
I don't put the book away. I don't stop reading the story. I skim or skip. I only give up reading if there seems to be no hope for a pay off. If I don't have an investment in the story -- if I don't see an end to the boredom -- if I feel trapped by tedium -- then I might stop reading.
So, if being bored isn't the worst thing in the world and I know that my own boredom of the moment doesn't kill an entire work for me as a reader, why should I be afraid of it as a writer?
A couple of years ago, I entered a content that encouraged courageous writing. My piece, "I Need This," was honored and I was able to publish, "Terminal Instar," in the Notes from Underground anthology. It took some guts. Some of it was what Rachel Thompson and Lorrie Moore would call, "writing something I would never show my mother or my father." Some of it, though, was writing minor little digressions that might risk boring some readers.
In the end, it's often times the digressions that get me my most positive feedback. It's taking a moment, amidst the adrenaline and emotional trauma, to philosophize a bit that I think gives my writing its special character. I don't just write thrillers. I write thrillers that linger and contemplate. No, I don't linger in the moment like RJ Ellory does. Instead, I linger in the ideas behind the scenes like Chuck Palahniuk might. It's a recipe that I think serves me well, but it's a recipe that risks boring people.
And that's really the point. It doesn't even matter if you're a writer. For that matter, it doesn't matter if you're a creative person at all. If you're an athlete you can't always go for the home run or the knock-out punch. If you're a salesman, you can't always play for the big deal. If you're an archaeologist you can't wait until you get a Phase III excavation. If you're a forensic anthropologist, you've gotta do your metrics.
Whatever you do, if you put your all into it, if you try to own that thing you do, you need to show courage. That doesn't just mean the adrenaline junkie kind of daring. That means being brave enough to risk boring people.
You will probably manage to do just that.
But you will also reap great rewards. And the truth is, most of the time, if you're good at what you do, you bore yourself more than you bore other people.
So. As readers -- what do you do when something gets boring? And, as followers of whatever path life has taken you down -- do you shy away from doing those things which might bore your clients?
.Nevets.
Your writing has never, ever bored me, just so you know. :) And like you, I sometimes skim stuff in books, but I try not to, and I rarely get super-bored and put the book down unless there is no hope of payoff. ANY book could bore a certain reader. The Bourne Identity books could be boring to some readers, while Shakespeare could excite them beyond reason. I think your writing has never bored me because it's so psychological and gets me thinking so much, while also being entertaining. Love it!
ReplyDeleteWell, first of all, I'm glad you don't find my writing boring. :)
ReplyDeleteSecond, I think I have only really bailed on three books in my time. One book was too poorly written (even though it was a best seller). Another book dwelt too much for the sake of dwelling, intending to make the reader uncomfortable as part of its very point (which is fine, but not why I read). Only one book have I given up on because it was utterly boring. Alas, I have given up on it three times. I keep trying, though. It's also a best-seller and well-beloved by friends and family.
Which is part of why I decided it was okay to risk boring people. If that particular book, which has had a great reception, bores me, then just about any book can bore someone. And in that case... No big deal. :)
Oh, I forgot to mention that I also wrote a guest post about beng bored that you might enjoy. :)
ReplyDeletehttp://andrewblackman.net/2012/07/when-you-expect-to-love-being-bored/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AndrewBlackman+%28Andrew+Blackman%29
Great post! I do think there's something to be said (for some people) about boring things being okay because they help them zone out. I don't really know how to zone out so that doesn't work for me... lol
ReplyDelete